I saw a web site the other day that mentioned something about a Michael McCarty that died in the military in 1863 in Indiana and it suggested that this may possibly have been Billy's real father. They said that Billy, his brother, and mother were in Indiana at this same time. This was the first that I had heard of this theory. Has anyone else heard this and if so do you have any more info regarding this?
In the past I had emailed Frederick Nolan (Billy the Kid historian and biographer) a similar question regarding Billy the Kid’s parents. He said he had the service record of Michael McCarty, age 27, from Cook County, Indiana who died from wounds received at Chickamauga on Nov 30, 1863, but he does no appear to have been married. So who Billy the Kid’s father was is still a complete mystery and not too much –if anything- is known about his mother, Catherine. Historians and Genealogists still haven’t found any answers or even put a dent in the research because it always leads to nowhere. Due to that fact, it’s mind boggling when people say they are related to Billy the Kid. How can they trace their roots to him, when there are no roots to be traced?
-- Edited by Webmaster at 10:01, 2004-07-27
__________________
~ Marcelle Brothers, Webmaster of About Billy the Kid & Forum Administrator ~
Exactly! How can roots be traced if there are no roots to trace to begin with?? I've always thought that and yet you go online to a website like say Rootsweb or Genweb, and there are literally hundreds of people claiming THEY have proof of the lineage or are searching that route. Don't get me wrong, I don't doubt for a minute that there is someone out there related to Billy the Kid, but it has yet to be proven. You can chuck those claims of kinship next to Brushy Bill's claim, because they have about the same amount of proof as he did...and Brushy Bill wasn't Billy!
I think it's a bunch of hogwash if you ask me...these people who are claiming kinship first need to prove who BOTH Billy's parents were before claiming kinship or else thier story doesn't hold water, no matter how books are written or CD's compiled and sold...even amateur genealogists know that!
One question to the answer Fred Nolan gave you though Webmaster, is that isn't it possible that the fellow in question and Billy's mama could have conceived Billy out of wedlock, and therefore is why there is no marriage record for the couple? I believe I have read a theory that it was possible Billy was illegit. I'm almost positive a researcher like FN would have followed this lead.
Since Catherine’s name was “McCarty” she was either married to a McCarty or that was her maiden name. Bill Antrim said she was a widow, so she was married at one time, but is he a reliable source? He was protective of her past. So anyways, for this man to be tied in with Catherine she was either married to him (but records say he wasn’t married) or by coincidence she had a fling with a man that had the same last name as her. Well, both don’t sound possible. If anything I suspect the “McCarty” husband was the father of Joseph, but not Billy. The rumor of Catherine having Billy out of wedlock is the most likely theory and nothing yet has proven otherwise.
As for self-titled descendants…I couldn’t agree more. None of them have yet to give one reasonable piece of evidence to support their claim or how they figured out the mystery of Billy’s roots while professional researchers could not, nor do they care to explain it because they know they can’t. For Billy to have had so many children born out of wedlock, I don’t know how on Earth he had time for anything else.
__________________
~ Marcelle Brothers, Webmaster of About Billy the Kid & Forum Administrator ~
Actually, I AM a Cousin to Billy through the Bonney Line. I have EVERYTHING on Paper here at Home, in a Folder, with Page Protectors, and Dividers. I also have Pictorial Evidence to Connect the Families.
I got a Call from BTKOG's Joe Micalizzi yesterday, and He has asked that I be the BTKOG BTK Family Genealogist, since I seem to have more than most Genealogists, Book Authors, and Researchers Combined.
It just so happens that My Family are Excellent Record Keepers, and I can Pinpoint Exactly where Billy's and My Lines Connect and Split.
I am in my 16th Year of Research on my Family Tree, and have enough to say that I can Truly Claim the Bonneys as my own. In Fact, I DO Claim the Bonneys as my own.
If y'all wish, I can put in a Complete Run Down of where the Lines are and who's in which Lines.
If it is given, do I have Permission to be able to give a Completed Family Tree here on this Site?
If that includes Billy's true lines connected to his real mother and father (no "what if" "maybe" "Cuz I said so" theories, but proof) and not just where you think you are connected, I sure would like to see your work posted, as I am sure everyone else would too.
Kate, first you said something about being related to him through his mother's side, and now you're saying that you're related to him through the Bonney line.
This is exactly what the Webmaster and I are talking about, but hopefully she will post her findings so that we can see for ourselves exactly what she is talking about.
I am also confused!!! Also I thought that there was really no clear evidence or reasoning as to why Billy actually adopted the name Bonney as an alias.
Actually, my Findings are Pretty Recent, and I had thought that the Mother was the Bonney, when it turned out that it was the Father, not the Mother, as I had Originally thought.
Here are My Findings:
My Direct Line:
Gen. 1:Melissa R. Clark M. Daniel L. Bryan
Gen. 2:Donald H. Clark M. Pierina Basile
Gen. 3:Katherine V. Denney M. Hugh E. Clark (Stone 2nd Marriage)
Gen. 4:Viola Dotson (Hambrick 2nd Marriage) M. Kirby D. Denney
Gen. 5:Reuben W. Dotson M. Sarah E. Myers (Myers/Murray Rodeo Dynasty is of this Line)
Gen. 6:William L.H. Dotson M. Henrietta Landrum(William Noted Civil War Veteran, Fought for the Nelson Grays, out of Attala Co., Bear Creek, MS., 4th MS. Infantry, Rank of Private)
Gen. 7:Reuben Dodson M. Nancy H. McConnico (This is Billy's Line for the Bonney's but this is Included Closer to the Bottom of the Post to show where the Lines Meet and Split)
Gen. 8:Elisha Dodson M. Rachel Henry(Henry, Lewis, Lee, Jefferson, Washington Line)
Gen. 9:Lazarus Dodson M. Alice Dodson
Gen. 10:George Dodson M. Margaret Dagord
Gen. 11:Thomas Dodson, Jr. M. Elizabeth Rose (Earp, Holliday, Hardin, Starr, James, Clanton, McLaury, and 4 NA Leaders' Line)
Gen. 12:Thomas Dodson, Sr. M. Dorothy M. Durham
Gen. 13:Charles Dodson, Sr. M. Anne Elmore
Gen. 14:Jesse Dodson M. Judith Hagger
Gen. 15: John Dods M. Jane Eagle Plume(are Original Settlers of Old Jamestowne Colony, VA., and are listed on Old Planters' Rolls and on Ship's Roster for the Susan Constant, Jane Daughter of VA. Iroquois Tribal Leader Eagle Plume)
Gen. 16: Chief Eagle Plume (VA. Iroquois)
ALL of this Direct Dods/Dodson/Dotson/Denney/Clark/Bryan Line Traced and Paper Proven)
Billy's Line: This is where My Line and his Meet and Split;
Parents of Nancy H. McConnico:
Gen. 8:Garner McConnico M. Mary Walker
Mary's Parents:
Gen. 9:Thomas Walker, Sr. M. Betty Ellis(This Happens to be also the GGGrandparents to the White House Bush Family)
Hunt Line:
Also my Direct Ancestors off of one Branch of the Dodson Family;
Gen. 10:Edmund Hunt M. Dorcas Oxenbridge
Gen. 9:Elizabeth Hunt M. Thomas Bonney (2nd Marriage for Thomas; Dorcus Sampson)
Gen. 8:John Bonney M. Elizabeth Bishop
Gen. 7:Levi Bonney M. Rhoda Pratt (Of Noted Mormon Pratt Family)
Gen. 6:Patrick Edward Bonney M. Catherine McCarty (2nd Marriage for Catherine; Henry Harrison Antrim) (Brief Marriage to my Dorothy Smoot by Henry)
Gen. 5: Patrick Henry Bonney McCarty M.Abrana S. Garcia
Gen. 4:Jose Patrocinio Garcia McCarty M. Beatrice?
First quick question: If Abrana and Billy were married, what happened to that marriage record, and why hasn't any researcher ever published it, or discovered it? Please don't tell us prejudice or a cover-up, those lines have been used to death.
Also, you mentioned a Myers/Murray connection, this wouldn't be Ty Murray's family, would it?
More questions to follow, too many to list in one post.
I'm not trying to put you down or anything, Kate, but I really question the theory that Billy was ever married. Wouldn't he be too busy to do something like that?
Kate, I’m not trying to turn this into an argument, but your records still don’tprove that Billy the Kid is connected to your family tree. How can you draw a line to Billy when his lineage is an utter mystery? Like I said, even professionals can’t trace his family tree. As far as we know the name “Bonney” could’ve been a name Billy picked for himself by random. How can you prove that Patrick Edward Bonney is indeed the father of Billy the Kid? On another note, the surnames of McCarty and Bonney were very common. I counted about 30 of them on Passenger Arrival Lists from 1800-1870s and that was just from one record, there are plenty more. My last name is Brothers, but that doesn’t mean I’m related to Dr. Joyce Brothers. Now if I wanted to I could easily trace my family tree to her, but without actually proof (documents, records, etc.) it wouldn’t be legitimate. I’m afraid that’s the case here.
You also said Billy and Abrana were married. Now I’ve known Bert Garcia for about 3 ½ years (about the time I started my website) and I’ve read his book “The Hispanic Connection” and we even had heated debates on Lucas Speer’s discussion board, but never ONCE has he claimed that Billy and Abrana were married –not once. So where is this coming from? Why hasn’t Bert said anything before about this or is this your theory? If it’s questionable and mystery as you said, then I wouldn’t declare it as FACT.
Lastly, implying that you’re related to the Garcia family has raised a huge red flag and I’m not going to get into it any further then that, but I think you know what I mean.
Anyways, thanks for sharing your info.
-- Edited by Webmaster at 22:49, 2004-07-27
__________________
~ Marcelle Brothers, Webmaster of About Billy the Kid & Forum Administrator ~
I agree, alot of what Can Chaser Kate has posted looks like bits and pieces put together that leave more questions than answers. Maybe if she clarifies the lines and shows a more direct connection, we can better understand what she posted.
I agree about Abrana and Billy being married...I mean, you can't just say they were married without some sort of record or documentation, and saying that records were destroyed in a fire (I've heard that line used before) just doesn't cut it. Even if records were destroyed, there has to be witnesses or an account somewhere that says yes they were married, and lived as a married couple. A historian somewhere in the past 123 years would have uncovered factual documentation/eyewitness account that they were indeed married. We may have to accept the fact that if Abrana did indeed bare Billy's child, it was a bastard plain and simple...but given the fact that documentation shows Abrana and Billy's alleged child was born in 1886 and there is no documentation to support the 1875 date, also raises a red flag. You can't just say there was a big cover-up without something to support it.
I do not mean to be Long - Winded, but in Defense of Myself and my History, here is what I have to say:
I have been more than Honest and Forthcoming in my Research Work.
I DO NOT know how to Lie About my History, nor do I care to "Make it up."
I add or Delete upon finding more Information that happens to come up as I go along. My Research is by No means Complete at this Point, but it is as good as what I can get it at this time.
I am a Genealogist. All of my 16 Years of Research Points to a Marriage of Billy and Abrana, and Patrocinio is by NO Means a Bastard Child.
I have Personally seen Copies of the 1875 Birth Certificate while I was in New Mexico, and got Photos thereof.
As a Genealogist, I glean Findings from those things which I Personally Research; such as for Example: a Direct Quote from Bert's own Book: "Billy was in Love with Abrana."
In Billy's Legend, it can be Gleaned that Billy and Abrana were In Fact Married, as when you find Billy's Name, Abrana and Patrocinio are Directly found under his Name. To a Genealogist, that Equals a Marriage, even Despite there being NO Record thereof. I have already said I am in Search of other Documents to Provide more Proof.
In the Book "I Buried Billy" by Paco Anaya, this is a Direct Quote from Billy's own Lips, and is found Several Times throughout said Book; "The Garcias are my In Laws." To a Genealogist, this is as Good as a Marriage Certificate.
My Direct Ancestry from Chief Eagle Plume to Myself has been thoroughly Researched, and I have Birth, Marriage, Death, Census, Church, and Baptismal Records to back this up; Including Family Trees, Pictures, Notes, and Source References for ALL my Work. I currently have this Information on CD Rom.
I would be more than happy to send Anyone who Requests it, Copies of ALL of my Work on CD Rom, Including the Link to Billy.
In Fact, I am So Completely Honest about my Work, that I have NO Problem with being Swabbed for DNA, to back up my Paper Research.
All of my Work is Treated as if it is Archival Work from a Museum. All of my Work is put in a HUGE 3 Ring Binder, and Each Generation is given its own Divider, and All Pages are put in Page Protectors. Each Binder is Clearly Marked with the Family or Branch that is being worked on.
One more thing that Allows me to be able to find what other Researchers have spent years trying to find, is that I have a Special Connection to my Loved Ones who have Passed on. They Guide me to the Needed Records. All I have to do is ask for thier Assistance. I am Sensitive Enough to tap into thier Energy.
My Work has been Triple Confirmed:
1.) Billy's Descendants say this:
"You have more than we do." "You have gone farther and more in Depth." "Yes, there is Definitely Something there." "We Accept you as Family."
2.) Prominent Authors and Researchers say this:
"Wow! Your Work is Fascinating!" "You have More than we do." "We wouldn't know where else to look, you seem to have the Connection to look in places we don't." "You have researched far beyond us, you have done your Homework."
3.) Joe Micalizzi Says this:
"You can be the BTKOG Billy the Kid Family Historian." "You are an Authority ahead of other Researchers on Billy."
These are ALL Direct Quotes from Prominent Sources.
I DO NOT do my Work Piecemeal. I do Very Accurate and thorough Research.
I do ALL of my Work Independently, and I Do Not Rely on other Researchers for Genealogical Information.
I find ALL of my Information by my own Research. Certainly, I Occassionally Read what other Researchers have to say, but I already know what is there.
To Can Chaser Kate: You're recent post is nothing more than to be defensive, it still does not answer questions that the Webmaster, myself or others on this discussion forum have asked you, sorry to say.
We never asked you what your credentials were, or for unverifiable quotes from the Garcia's or Joe Micalizzi. If the Garcia's have accepted you as family, they have yet to do so publicly. (If you can get either person to publicly declare what you wrote in your post, I would be glad to drop that part of the discussion.) However even if the Garcia's publicly endorse you as family, it still doesn't mean either of you are related to Billy the Kid.
I understand that you yourself believe you are guided by loved ones in your research, and that is fine for you. But if you are going to make claims that you are related to this person and that person and you say you can prove it, you need to show something more than than you have shown us so far. All we ask is that you define your lines to BTK a little more clearly, while showing the rest of the family chart and where exactly you fall in line with them. The work you have presented to us so far doesn't do that.
As far as the 1875 birth certificate you have claimed to have seen..I haven't noticed it published in "The Hispanic Connection" Booklet. The author himself writes on page 32 that "I have the original baptismal certificate of grandpa Pat that shows what I believe an attempt by Abrana to conceal the young boy's age by using a bogus birthdate. She signs her name Abrana Segura Garcia and baptized grandpa as Patrocinio Garcia and father Martin Garcia." On the same page, he also writes "We have searched for other vital records through the state of New Mexico but were unable to find any legal record of this baptism or any birth record other than our document. It appears that the vital records are not available or have been stolen by particular authors, nevertheless our baptismal certificate was created to show that grandpa Pat's birthdate was 1886." Now, if you actually seen the 1875 birth record, why would Mr. Garcia make such a statement as above and why would he choose not to publish the birth certificate that would once and for all prove that he is in fact kin to Billy the Kid? How do you explain the census records that Wayne Kindred had sent me (of which I asked for) where Patricinio's records coinside with the 1886 birthdate?
Although "I buried Billy" was a great read and one of my favorite books, it was published years after Billy's death and, filled with many historical mistakes so it is far more unreliable than books written by other authors. If they were in fact married, there would be records either by state, or by church, or by the very least an eyewitness account that flat out states yes, they were a married couple. Any why is the claim that Abrana and Billy were married not made in the "Hispanic Connection" booklet?
I don't want to hear your credentials or what other people have said about your work, I would rather see factual information that can be verified.
Now I know you’ve probably spent a lot of time and hard work on your research, but none of your documentation can prove that Billy the Kid is linked to your family tree. You are also basing your research on hearsay and not fact. Now if you have done detailed research, as you have implied, then you would know that it would be impossible for Billy to have sex with Abrana anywhere from 1874 and even the early part of 1875 for Patrocinio to have been born in 1875. During that time Billy was at his dying mother’s bedside and then a young orphan in Silver City. He didn’t leave Silver City till he ran away on Sept 25, 1875 and went to Arizona to find his stepfather. He didn’t even leave Arizona until August of 1877, and he arrive in Lincoln for the first time in October of 1877 with Jesse Evans Gang. There is documentation of all of this, so care to explain how Billy and Abrana could know each other before 1875? Was she a waitress at the Exchange Hotel where Billy worked to earn his keep?? Was she at one of the brothels at Fort Grant, Arizona? Of course that’s not so, but neither is that ABSURD claim by the Garcia family in the “Hispanic Connection” book that Billy the Kid was in Fort Sumner in 1872. In 1872 he was with his mother traveling from Indiana to Colorado! Come on now....you have been boasting on what a great researcher you are, can’t you see for yourself, but instead you are using hearsay, gossip, rumors, and delusional ideas that clash with historical facts as gospel. Prove me wrong and convince me how Billy and Abrana could possibly know each other around 1874-1875 in Lincoln and/or in Fort Sumner when he was nowhere near either of those places at that time.
My other question hasn’t been answered yet on where you got that notion that Billy and Abrana were married when even the Garcia family has never claimed that.
In a final word, to continue with what you’re doing I think you do need the assistance of other researchers and genealogist, because you are manipulating your findings to fit your own personal desire to be related to Billy the Kid, whether your findings are accurate or not.
Sorry to be so candid (it's nothing against you personally), but I'm not going to beat around the bush on this topic to avoid stepping on one's toes.
__________________
~ Marcelle Brothers, Webmaster of About Billy the Kid & Forum Administrator ~
Hey!! you in the Jail, come out with your hands up! You're surrounded! Drop 'em Kate, nice & slow, mosey over here behind this big rock, if you take a big breath in, there's room for two of us!
Questions for Kate: In a previous post, you said: "I am a Genealogist. All of my 16 Years of Research Points to a Marriage of Billy and Abrana, and Patrocinio is by NO Means a Bastard Child." I find this statement a bit confusing. Do you mean that you have spent 16 years researching the marriage of Billy and Abrana? If so, how did you become privy to such info 16 years ago?
You also stated: "In the Book "I Buried Billy" by Paco Anaya, this is a Direct Quote from Billy's own Lips, and is found Several Times throughout said Book; "The Garcias are my In Laws." To a Genealogist, this is as Good as a Marriage Certificate."
I own this book and only a couple of weeks ago took the time to carefully reread it with the intentions of gaining insights on Billy not mentioned in any other history books. My emphasis is on the word "carefully". I took my time and perused slowly, so as to absorb as much knowledge as I could. Frankly, had I found mention of Billy being quoted as saying "The Garcias are my in-laws," I would've remembered. Well, I don't. I did, however, find one reference, on page 98, to a Garcia as an in-law. But it was no "direct quote" from Billy. The statement comes from Senor Anaya, and this is what he said: "The boy made all sorts of promises to Pat, as we heard later through my brother-in-law, Higinio Garcia . . .." So Kate, could you please point out the exact pages that contain passages in I Buried Billy, by Paco Anaya, in which Billy is quoted as saying that the Garcia's are indeed his in-laws. I'd be fascinated to see these quotes with my own eyes.
I would be very slow to call any child a "Bastard Child" no matter what century he/she were born in. A child, is a child is a child.
When the child was a child It walked with arms hanging Wanted the stream,,to be a river, and the river a torrent, And this puddle, the sea When the child was a child, it didn't know It was a child, Everything for it was filled with life, and all life was one. Saw the horizon, without trying to reach it Couldn't rush itself, And think on command Was often terribly bored. And couldn't wait Passed up greeting the moments And prayed only with it's lips When the child was a child It didn't have an opinion about a thing Had no habits Often sat crossed-legged, took off running Had a cow lick in it's hair And didn't put on a face when photographed
When the child was a child It was the time of the following questions Why am I me and why not you Why am I here and why not there Why did time begin and where does space end Isn't what I see and hear and smell Just the appearance of the world in front of the world Isn't life under the sun just a dream Does evil actually exist in people Who really are evil Why can't it be that I who am Wasn't before I was And that sometime I, the I, I am No longer will be the I, I am
When the child was a child It gagged on spinach, on peas, on rice pudding And on steamed cauliflower And now eats all of it and not just because it has to When the child was a child It woke up once in a strange bed And now time and time again Many people seem beautiful to it And now not so many and now only if it's lucky It had a precise picture of paradise And now can only vaguely conceive of it at best It couldn't imagine nothingness And today shudders in the face of it Go for the ball Which today rolls between it's legs With it's I'm here it came Into the house which now is empty
When the child was a child It played with enthusiasm And now only with such former concentration Where it's work is concerned When the game, task, activity, subject happens to be it's work
When the child was a child It was enough to live on apples and bread. And it's still that way When the child was a child berries fell Only like berries into it's hand. And still do The fresh walnuts made it's tongue raw. And still do Atop each mountain it craved Yet a higher mountain. And in each city it craved Yet a bigger city. And still does Reach for the cherries in the treetop As elated as it still is today Was shy in front of strangers. And still is It waited for the first snow. And still waits that way When the child was a child It waited restlessly each day for the return of the loved one And still waits that way When the child was a child It hurled a stick like a lance into a tree And it's still quivering there today
Now, hey, hey, were we not all once that particular child? Did the child of Billy (if any existed) not feel the same way? Did you? Did I? Did Billy himself? Answer is pretty obvious, is it not?
Robert1953: What does that sappy poem have to do with the discussion at hand?
A bastard is a bastard is a bastard no matter what you call it. If you are looking for political correctness, you can call it an illegitimate child, but in all honesty it's still a bastard child. Sorry to be so blunt, but I hate political correctness crap. Political correctness is the reason why our schools are in so much trouble- too much political correctness, not enough truth in learning!
Now, if we can get back to getting the questions posed to C.C.Kate to answer regarding her research, this discussion will be interesting again!
Not having that dismissive missive, I'm afraid. Political Correctiveness went out the window, in the real world, a long time ago, All I'm saying is, simmer down, It just seems to me that whenever the scent of a wounded critter is in the air, the wolves gather.
No reason to simmer, just trying to get to the truth of the matter. You see, hundreds of people claim kinship to Billy the Kid...and that is fine, if they want to claim it, more power to them. There were more than one Billy the Kid as well so you could understand our skeptisim here.
If someone is going to make the claim publicly and then quote people without thier permission, then people will want answers before they accept that person's claim. The person make the claim is well aware of this, so no need to pity them. They may be descendants, they may have all these credentials but please, back up your statements before putting it out there.
I don't consider anyone wounded here, C.C.Kate willingly put herself on the spot, all we are doing is trying to get to the bottom of it all. Like the Webmaster, for me it's nothing personal but I am not concerned about stepping on anybody's toes.
Well now, call that lyric "sappy" if you will, but I have yet to find the person that can better "Van Morrison" on a lyric, even Mr. Dylan would allow that methinks. Bastard is, as Bastard does, I just think that is rude to call any child so, I have two of my own, so I speak from experience. There is nothing wrong with "one parent families" And yes the truth is important, but is it "all important?" to be right all of the time? Yes authenticity is the goal, but lets not forget human nature and the overlooking of human mistakes, however well ment, be thou so forgiven. As the Bard said: "Oh the gift for god to gie us, to see ourself's as others see us"
(See page 2 to continue with this thread......... -Marcelle, Webmistress & Forum Administrator)