Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: "Could this be Billy" photos..


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Date:
"Could this be Billy" photos..
Permalink Closed


Hi, love the web site btw!  I was looking at both the photos that are thought to be Billy.


The first one could be...I have no ideal.  Looks enough like him, but im no expert.  The declarations of authenticity say alot.


The second one is absolutely NOT him.  Being a nurse, I studied the human body in college, and something I found amusing was the UNATTACHED and ATTACHED genetic trait in earlobes.  Billys are undoubtedly UNATTACHED, while the second of the questionable photos are undoubtedly ATTACHED.  Unless someone got really ****ed and detached his poor earlobes later in his life, this just couldnt be Billy.


Thought someone might think this was interesting:D


Liz



__________________
Liz


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 211
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks for your input and welcome to the board.

__________________
~ Marcelle Brothers, Webmaster of About Billy the Kid & Forum Administrator ~


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:
Permalink Closed

Where do I go to view these photos?

__________________
Jeremy Poche'


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Date:
Permalink Closed

http://www.aboutbillythekid.com/purported_billypic.htm


 


try this link, or just look on the main page .


 


Liz



__________________
Liz


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yes, they are ALL Absolutely Billy, showing him growing up throughout his short Life.


 



__________________
Can Chaser Kate SASS 19587 BTKOG New Regulator


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Date:
Permalink Closed

Did you look at the ears....the second pic is not him.  Couldn't be.  The photo that we all know as Billy doesnt appear to have attached earlobes (it seems clear to me anyway), the 1rst of the questionable photos doesnt have attached earlobes, and the 2nd DOES have attached earlobes.  Earlobes do not spontaneously unattach, i assure you.  On that note, it doesnt matter anyway, as i can promise you that the questionable billy photos are NOT of the same person.  My money is on the first photo being billy. 


liz



__________________
Liz


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by:

"Hi, love the web site btw!  I was looking at both the photos that are thought to be Billy.
The first one could be...I have no ideal.  Looks enough like him, but im no expert.  The declarations of authenticity say alot.
The second one is absolutely NOT him.  Being a nurse, I studied the human body in college, and something I found amusing was the UNATTACHED and ATTACHED genetic trait in earlobes.  Billys are undoubtedly UNATTACHED, while the second of the questionable photos are undoubtedly ATTACHED.  Unless someone got really ****ed and detached his poor earlobes later in his life, this just couldnt be Billy.
Thought someone might think this was interesting:D
Liz
"


I agree with you. There is also a photo I don't
see here on the cover of the book, "The Capture of
Billy the Kid." This is by James Earle. You would
think someone could authenticate some of these.
I know they have found someone who has authenticated several new photos of Jesse, using
the same technique used in the documentary on
Discovery.

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Date:
Permalink Closed

I find it hard to believe that the two photo's are Billy the Kid. Mostly because of the facial features that should match but do not. There is one photo out there, that it is said to be Billy the Kid's son and according to forensics, the facial features DO match. Sometime's I wonder if that picture could actually be Billy the Kid at a different age and not his son!?

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
Permalink Closed

There is a picture on crimelibrary.com which is used on their Billy page (I think it's around page 7).  it really does look like him... well at least I think it does.

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink Closed

The second picture of the "kid" IMO is not him. The ears are attached . in the origional tintype of the kid his ears are not attached, also look at the Eyebrow area as u grow your eyebrow tends to stay the same.


The second photo, I believe is not william H Bonney IMO . BUT i could be wrong , like i said he has non- attached ears


if u look at the two pictures of the tintype you can see stunning similarities that the other two pics are possibly the same person . possibly the kid



__________________
"Hello Bob "~ Billy the Kid


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink Closed

So the second one is fake? I only know that 'classic' foto about him is a real one, I did not find any other 'real' picture material jet...

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard